About the cookies. I've been thinking about the cookies,

and how they were used in phplogcon, and what i understood was that the cookie just stored some auth values. So if someone wanted to be remember by cookies, would it not be better to send the php session id (SID) as a cookie (default php install). I'm assuming you have the --enable-trans-id turned on and the session id is passed via url?
So, by removing the cookies produced by phplogcon did not really disable cookie authentication. Unless you have the sid in the uri ( session.use_cookies = 0 )
So if cookies are on, the session id should be sent as a cookie. If cookies are off then sessions will rely on url. Since we can generate new session ids each time the users navigates the site (page to page, or between logins) this will offer a bit more robust method of a secure web app. The sid can be updated in the cookie or the url. This will reduce the possibility of an attacker guessing the sid since it is constantly changing. And if proper house keeping is done at logout the session data can be destroyed. Also php has garbage collection to clean up old sessions. Further more, storing a sesion expire value in the uses DB entry will furhter limit the time frame the user is allowed between acceses. (Auto refresh will work nice here, since the session can be set to expire after say 1 hour).
phplogcon relies heavily on the $_SESSION[] array to store user settings. When cookies are on, the session is not started, and no session info saved between site accesses, (save for the stuff in the DB) thus the only way the web app knows the user is validated is by some cookie values. (eaisly faked) Since the values are static and the expire is set for (30days?) anyone who has access to the computer can access the logs if the user does not log out. (I wont touch on the other way to get by the login that i previously reported).
If you are paranoid of the web I dont sugest reading this article. However, if you want to find out how vurneralbe you (and i mean you the person reading this BB, and not phplogcon) are to attackers you should read this.
http://www.acros.si/papers/session_fixation.pdf
I have not tried these yet, but from what i read, i think 90% of my php web apps are unsecure. I posted this here because this is good for any sysadmin to know, even if he/she does not write the php code. I think that if phplogcon is written properly it can over come may of the issue described within that article.
I'm also going to say this. phpLogCon is great

I like the software i think it has great possibilities, but at this point I would not expose it to the public web.

I myself am running phpLogCon (not just the demos) I have a second httpd running on a 192.x.x.x address that cannot be accessed by the public. But i would like to, so that is why i'm going to try to help as much as possible to fix these problems.
BTW: anyone reading this is free to jump in and comment on phplogcon. I want to know peoples thoughts about the software.