Confused about CAL

Discussions on Microsoft's new server operating system. This works in conjunction with the http://www.windows-expert.net web pages.

Moderator: alorbach

Confused about CAL

Postby sami2004 on Sat Jan 13, 2007 11:13 pm

My company owns a network currently with 28 PCs and an older server that uses windows 2000 Pro.
I am building a new server and I want to use windows 2003 server 64 bit.
The server will basicaly serve as a file server. Why do I need to buy CAL for each PC on the network? They all have windows XP on them.
We already paid microsoft for the operating systems why do we have to buy again?
sami2004
New
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 11:07 pm

Postby kburden1 on Tue Jan 16, 2007 4:44 pm

If I remember correctly you don't have to. I think those are meant for non-windows based machines. Every copy of windows xp already has it's on CAL. I could be completely wrong, but it sounds right.
kburden1
New
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 4:17 pm

Postby rgerhards on Tue Jan 16, 2007 4:51 pm

I think its actually the case that you need to purchase cals.

Why that? Because MS wants you to. There is no inner logic in licensing. These are the conditions that Microsoft licenses under and you can either accept them or ignore them. I personally do not like the CAL idea, at least not for for machines where already money was paid for (thus our own software does not require CALS for machines that runs another part of the system - but that's a totally different story).

Sorry for the bad news...

Rainer
User avatar
rgerhards
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1282
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 11:57 am

Google Ads



Return to Windows Server 2003

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron